According to an analysis of FDA Warning Letters in 2021, the top contributors to data integrity failures in labs were:
Frustratingly enough, each of these failures is entirely preventable. All that is required is good data management and data integrity practices.
Can it be so simple? In this article, we’ll break down what data integrity means for labs, how to implement best practices, and which software platforms can help automate and speed up processes to maintain data while saving your staff time.
Data integrity is the practice of ensuring that all information in your lab is consistent, complete, and accurate.
This is a core competency of any functioning lab. The data lifecycle – spanning from creation to processing, review, reporting, use, retention, and eventual destruction – demands careful oversight at each stage to uphold integrity. Maintaining data integrity also includes keeping an audit trail of any changes in the event data is modified.
How can your lab ensure it maintains data integrity? Adhere to the following:
Read on as we break down specifics and share best practices for ensuring data integrity in your lab.
Beyond the high-level characteristics above, the ALCOA PLUS (+) may be helpful in guiding your lab to maintain data integrity best practices.
The ALCOA PLUS framework is widely used in industries like pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and healthcare to protect data integrity, quality, and reliability. That’s because it plays a key role in helping these labs meet GxP standards.
There are two pieces to this framework:
ALCOA: ALCOA represents the core principles of data integrity. This means guaranteeing that data is:
PLUS: PLUS elements provide added layers to further strengthen data management. This means ensuring that data is:
Meeting these standards can be difficult (or next to impossible) manually but specialized tools and software can help. Next, we’ll share the consequences of failing to maintain data integrity and then share tools your lab can use to manage its data.
If you think data integrity is just about regulatory checkboxes, think again. Here’s how small errors cascade into significant damage down the road. According to the “1-10-100 rule” developed by authors George Labovitz and Yu Sang Chang in the 1990s, if it costs your lab $1 to fix a data entry error as soon as it’s made, it will cost $10 at the next step in the process, and if the error persists and becomes part of an analytical sample report, it will cost $100 to fix.
Beyond this “napkin math” calculation, there are real consequences and downstream effects to even the most seemingly innocuous error.
It’s estimated that up to 42% of your staff’s time is spent on manual paperwork and administrative tasks. Supposing a base salary of $52,000, this means that manual data entry likely costs your lab around $22,000 per staff member. As your lab scales, the financial burden of manual data entry (and the added time to fix errors) increases.
Data integrity errors can put you at serious risk of failing to meet compliance regulations.
Issues caused by poor data integrity can trigger regulatory inspections, requiring extensive corrective action plans and possibly external consultants. Regulatory bodies may increase inspection frequency or require additional documentation, creating ongoing compliance burdens. In severe cases, your lab can lose its certification status.
If your lab deals with patient data or manufactures products, data integrity issues could put you at risk of liability claims and litigation expenses. These costs include attorney fees, settlements, court expenses, and increased insurance premiums. Errors can invalidate studies and create liability issues with research sponsors.
Legal complications can lead to reputational damage as well.
Compromised or inaccurate data can lead to misinformation, flawed decisions, and ultimately reputational damage when stakeholders lose confidence in an organization’s reliability. For consumers, trust hinges on knowing their data is accurate, protected, and ethically used, and any breach of that trust can erode loyalty and hamper growth.
While the stakes are high, ensuring data integrity can be a simple process for your lab – if you make a consistent effort.
The following best practices will help ensure your lab’s data integrity:
Next, we’ll share the top software tools your lab can use to maintain data integrity.
Between an ELN and a LIMS, we recommend a LIMS as the best software to help maintain data integrity and prevent errors. A LIMS can help your lab secure and manage its data through the following:
Of the platforms available, there is nothing better suited to helping your lab maintain data integrity than a LIMS.
Data integrity is just one piece of a functioning and compliant lab. Laboratory compliance requires even more preparation and proactive oversight.
Whether you’re preparing to pass inspection or worried about a surprise audit, click the button below to download our lab compliance guide. In this guide, we break down the most common regulations you will encounter, best practices for meeting them, and guidance on software and tools you can use.