
Benchling is one of the titans in lab software for biotech labs; Labguru positions itself as an easier-to-use yet still robust LIMS; and QBench earns top marks as one of the most configurable LIMS on the market.
Which will you choose?
The choice isn’t exactly clear-cut. It depends on your lab size, needs, capabilities, and regulatory requirements. In this guide, we’ll share the pros and cons of these three platforms to help you make the right choice for your lab.
The first choice you need to make is whether you need a LIMS or an ELN.
While Labguru and Benchling both offer some LIMS features, they are considered ELNs first, and LIMS second.
The distinction here is significant. ELNs (electronic lab notebooks) are digital versions of paper lab notebooks, while LIMS (lab information management systems) are much more robust software platforms.
It’s not that ELNs are bad platforms or unsuitable for lab use. ELNs are fantastic tools, in the right context. If you’re taking a first step toward digitizing your lab’s data, inventory, and test results, then an ELN is a great tool. But if you need to do things like:
Then an ELN just won’t support you as well as a LIMS. This alone might make QBench the better choice when compared to Labguru and Benchling (though check out our guide to the best LIMS for a full roundup of your options).
Some LIMS are open source, some are self-hosted, and some are hosted in the cloud. Which will you choose?
There’s no true one-size-fits-all platform. To help you make the right choice for your lab, we recommend considering the following:
Now, let’s take a closer look at how these three LIMS platforms compare.
QBench is a fully configurable and flexible cloud-hosted LIMS, ideal for labs looking for a platform that empowers their work rather than getting in the way.
Unlike legacy LIMS vendors that lock you into expensive pro services contracts, QBench puts the power of configuration in your hands. Whether you want to generate a report, batch run a test, or create a self-service portal for internal and external customers, you can build it in QBench.
Many QBench customers have felt the pain of legacy LIMS and how vendor-created, code-driven customizations lead to slow, costly updates. Rather than slow you down, QBench’s deep workflow configurability and flexible, easy-to-use tools allow for quick workflow adjustments, report modifications, and automation tweaks.
It’s no wonder that time and time again, QBench leads the pack on G2. Among its most recent accolades are badges for:
QBench is fast to implement as well, especially when compared to legacy vendors.
After working with hundreds of labs, we’ve found there can be a temptation to get everything configured perfectly before going live (you may have heard this referred to as a “Big Bang” approach). The labs we serve work in regulated industries, so we get why this is sometimes the initial desire of a lab. Rather than delaying the value of working software by trying to set (and test) everything at once, QBench takes a “phased approach,” partnering with you to identify the essential pieces to get up and running first. By taking a phased approach, labs don’t bite off more than they can chew on the initial project. This helps them move faster and get value more quickly.
QBench is privately owned by a group of families and software investors with over 30 years of lab experience and a long-term time horizon, meaning that they prioritize building the best culture, continuous innovation, and a business that drives value for customers for many years to come. QBench's employees are distributed globally to serve customers worldwide, but most (85%) are in North America (as of 2025).
QBench Price: QBench starts at $275/month for five users, with implementation and training costs ranging from $5,000-$10,000.
Top Features:
Industries served:
And more!
Labguru is an excellent option for small labs looking to streamline and scale their operations with a focus on simplicity, ease of use, and user-friendliness.
As mentioned above, Labguru is more ELN-forward and focused on inventory management, but it does offer a LIMS as well with features for inventory management, automation, and reporting.
Previously, Labguru was owned by Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, a European publishing house. As of 2025, Labguru is now owned by Titian Software, a UK-based Sample Management business, which is itself owned by the private equity division of Battery Ventures. Roughly 43% of its staff are located in Europe and the Middle East, 30% in North America, and 28% in Asia.
Like QBench, Labguru is well-reviewed on G2 with an overall rating of 4.6/5. 34% of their reviews are from customers in Europe, 32% from the Middle East, and 32% from North America (according to LinkedIn).
Labguru Price: Not available
Top features:
Industries served:
Benchling is another popular LIMS platform, though, like Labguru, it is traditionally more of an ELN-forward product than a true LIMS. Benchling offers a suite of ELN and LIMS features, and is typically best suited for labs in the biotech and genomics industries.
Of the three on this list, Benchling is most specialized for the needs of biotech, genomics, and healthcare labs, and for that reason, it’s a common choice in those industries. Given that level of specialization, Benchling is far and away the most expensive vendor of the three, so if your lab is price-conscious, you may want to consider Labguru or QBench.
Benchling is privately owned by 23 investors. Roughly 87% of its employees are based in North America, and 11% are in the EMEA region (according to LinkedIn). Benchling is well-reviewed on G2 with 4.5/5 stars. However, they haven't had a new review on G2 since January 2025.
Benchling Price: Last published on its website in 2020, pricing started at around $20,000/year for five users on the professional plan. It’s possible that the pricing has increased significantly since then.
Top features:
Industries served:
If you’re still unsure which of these three platforms is right for you, let’s make it even easier.
Choose QBench if…
Choose Labguru if…
Choose Benchling if…
There are several reasons why QBench is a consistent leader across categories on G2, but they all boil down to a singular point: Labs can get more done with QBench LIMS.
While many legacy LIMS are complex and constraining, QBench frees up modern labs to focus more on science and less on managing clunky software. Specifically, labs love QBench for the following reasons:
Unlike Labguru and Benchling, QBench is a LIMS through and through.
As we’ve explained above, it’s not that ELNs are bad platforms or unsuitable for lab use. ELNs are fantastic tools – in the right context.
If you’re taking a first step toward digitizing your lab’s data, inventory, and test results, then an ELN is a great tool. But if you need to manage data and processes at scale, an ELN just won’t support you as well as a LIMS.
If you need advanced support for automation and data management in a configurable platform that you can control, then QBench is the LIMS for you.
Automation is key for modern labs, and the lack of configurable automation is one of the top reasons modern labs should consider a fully-featured LIMS over ELNs like Benchling and Labguru.
Terms like “configurability” and “no-code” are becoming buzzwords in the LIMS industry, but for QBench, they are anything but. QBench takes a configurable approach to LIMS, which means you don’t need vast IT resources or expensive development contracts to adjust workflows or make simple changes.
With QBench’s workflow and automation tools, you can:
There is no need for complex development work or custom code; most legacy LIMS sell you the dream but deliver the nightmare. With QBench, you’ll need to pinch yourself after seeing what you can configure on your own.
The more connected your lab software and instruments are, the smoother the process will be as you scale. That’s why QBench offers a RESTful API that allows you to:
We’ve heard horror stories from labs that worked with legacy LIMS systems that claimed to offer an API, but required spinning up a new endpoint for each new client. One lab made a change to their data model and had to wait nine months for that change to be accessible via API. In contrast, QBench’s API support adds to the flexibility of its LIMS, helping you get more done and achieve your laboratory objectives.
All of these powerful features are great, but if your LIMS isn’t easy to implement and use, they are all for naught. Fortunately, QBench consistently earns high marks for ease of use thanks to its:
Megan, of EO Science, says it best after choosing QBench over seven other LIMS:
“QBench is easy to use and understand, allowing Laboratory Management to configure almost everything with minimal support needed. It is highly configurable while not overwhelming. Implementation is much faster than other systems due to the ease of use and configuration. Plus, QBench is constantly enhancing the product with new features and providing easily accessible help tools.”
Any vendor can launch a flashy software product with a slick interface. QBench takes this one step further by taking care to partner with its customers, giving labs a powerful software platform with guidance and insights to put it to work. We regularly speak with our customers and integrate their feedback and feature requests into our product development process.
We believe in building a LIMS that empowers labs to get more done, and that starts with taking their needs and feedback seriously.
So, between these three leading scientific software platforms, which will you choose?
Both Benchling and Labguru are excellent ELNs with LIMS features built in, but if your lab is looking for a LIMS that provides:
We suggest QBench: a LIMS that helps your lab work smarter with unparalleled flexibility to drive whatever the future brings.
Click the button below to schedule a demo and see for yourself.